What is MoSCoW Prioritisation Method and How it Works?

Any project is a bustling marketplace of tasks, each clamouring for attention. So, how do you decide which task deserves priority? A proven way to make this tough decision is through the MoSCoW Prioritisation method. This simple yet powerful approach helps you categorise tasks into must-haves, should-haves, could-haves, and won’t-haves.

Think of it as a roadmap that guides your team, cutting through the chaos and ensuring vital tasks are completed while resources are smartly managed. This blog explores how MoSCoW Prioritisation creates a clear framework for setting priorities and aligning stakeholders from Project Management to product development. Dive in and master your task hierarchy with ease!

Table of Content

1) What is MoSCoW Prioritisation Method?

2) Why Use the MoSCoW Method?

3) How Does MoSCoW Prioritisation Work?

4) MoSCoW Prioritisation Categories

5) How Can Development Teams Use MoSCoW Prioritisation?

6) Benefits and Drawbacks of MoSCoW Prioritisation Method

7) Best Practices for MoSCoW Prioritisation

8) Real-world Examples of MoSCoW Prioritisation in Action

9) Conclusion

What is MoSCoW Prioritisation Method?

The MoSCoW Prioritisation method is a simple way to organise tasks or requirements by importance. It breaks items into four levels: Must-have (essential), Should-have (important but not urgent), Could-have (nice to include), and Won’t-have (not needed now). This method helps teams focus on the most crucial tasks first, making it especially helpful in Agile projects to manage scope and meet key objectives.

By clearly defining priorities, MoSCoW helps prevent scope creep and keeps projects on track. It helps allocate resources effectively and ensures critical tasks are completed before moving on to less important ones. This structured approach improves project outcomes and cultivates clear communication with stakeholders.

Why Use the MoSCoW Method?

MoSCoW Prioritisation is a simple way for project teams to focus on the most important tasks first. By tackling essential work first, they can complete the main parts of a project quickly, leaving the extra features for later. It keeps everyone aligned, so the whole team knows what to work on.

MoSCoW also helps the team and customer identify tasks that aren’t necessary, cutting out unnecessary work and keeping the project lean and efficient. This approach minimises wasted time, effort, and resources, making it a key part of Agile Project Management.
 

How Does MoSCoW Prioritisation Work?

Before starting a MoSCoW Analysis, a few key steps need to happen. First, stakeholders and the product team should align on the project’s goals and what factors will determine priority. Next, they need to agree on which tasks to prioritise and how to handle any disagreements that may come up.

Resolving potential conflicts early can keep the project on track. Finally, the team should decide how much time and resources to allocate to each priority level. Once these basics are set, they can begin categorising each task using the MoSCoW method.

1) Balancing MoSCoW Priorities: Ensure each priority level gets the right focus without overloading any category.

2) Defining MoSCoW Prioritisation Categories: Clearly outline what qualifies as Must, Should, Could, and Won’t have.

3) Prioritisation Right Time: Conduct MOSCOW Analysis early in the project to keep everyone aligned from the start.

4) Reviewing Priorities: Regularly revisit priorities to adjust as project needs evolve.

Want to command every project with finesses? Our PRINCE2 Practitioner Training will show you how - Sign up now!
 

MoSCoW Prioritisation Categories

As mentioned above, MoSCoW is a simple way to remember four key categories during a prioritisation session. It stands for Must-have, Should-have, Could-have, and Won’t-have, helping teams clearly define task priorities. let's explore each of these categories:

Must-have

a) Must-have initiatives are non-negotiable and essential for the project, product, or release.

b) These tasks are critical for the product to function properly. Without them, the release would be incomplete.

c) Example: In a healthcare app, security features for compliance are considered must-have to meet regulatory requirements.

d) Questions to consider:

i) What will happen if this initiative is not included in the release?

ii) Is there a simpler way to achieve the same outcome?

iii) Will the product work without it?

e) It is classified as a must-have if the product or release cannot function effectively without it.
 

Should-have

a) Should-have initiatives are important but not critical to the product, project, or release.

b) The product can still function without these tasks, but they add significant value when included.

c) These tasks can be deferred to a future release without affecting current functionality.

d) Examples of this include performance improvements, minor bug fixes, or new features that improve the user experience.

e) Unlike must-have tasks, should-have initiatives can be scheduled for later without disrupting the main objectives.
 

Could-have

a) Could-have initiatives are nice-to-have features not essential to the product’s core functionality.

b) Unlike should-have initiatives, they have minimal impact on the overall outcome if not implemented.

c) These tasks are often the first to be deprioritised if must-have or should-have tasks require more time or resources than expected.

d) Could-have initiatives can be included if time and resources allow, but they are not a priority.

e) Examples include minor design tweaks, optional features, or small usability enhancements.
 

Won’t-have 

a) The won’t-have category helps manage expectations by clearly defining what will not be included in the current release or timeframe.

b) It is a key tool for preventing scope creep, ensuring the team stays focused on priority tasks.

c) Assigning initiatives to this category clarifies that they are not priorities for the current period, allowing teams to allocate resources effectively.

d) Some initiatives in this category may be revisited in future releases, while others may be permanently deprioritised.

e) Teams can create subcategories within the won’t-have group to differentiate between postponed and excluded tasks.

Blend structure with speed and give your projects the perfect finish! Sign up for our PRINCE2 Agile® Foundation and Practitioner Training now!
 

How Can Development Teams Use MoSCoW Prioritisation?

While the MoSCoW approach helps prioritise tasks around a team’s limited time, it also works when a development team faces limitations besides time. This is how development teams can use MoSCoW Prioritisation:
 

Set Priorities According to Financial Limitations

If a development team is working with a limited budget instead of a strict deadline, they can use the MoSCoW method to prioritise tasks. By collaborating with Product Managers, they can first identify the must-have and should-have items. Then, based on the budget, they can decide which tasks they can realistically complete.
 

Set Priorities According to the Team's Expertise

A product team with limited developer expertise may face challenges in delivering certain features. If the roadmap includes tasks beyond their skill set, this limitation will impact their prioritising of those items in the MoSCoW Analysis.
 

Set Priorities According to Conflicting Company Demands

Cross-functional teams may also face challenges due to other company priorities. For example, if the team wants to work on a new product release but has tight deadlines for other projects, they can use the MoSCoW method to decide which tasks are must-haves. Similarly, they can determine which can be postponed, and which can wait.
 

Benefits and Drawbacks of MoSCoW Prioritisation Method

Here the key benefits and drawbacks of using the MoSCoW Prioritisation method:

Best Practices for MoSCoW Prioritisation

If you’re thinking about using MoSCoW Prioritisation, here are some steps to follow. Adding these steps to your process can help your team get more out of the method.
 

Use a Clear and Objective Scoring System

a) MoSCoW helps categorise tasks as must-have, should-have, could-have, and won’t-have, but it doesn’t define how to rank them.

b) To effectively assign items to each category, use a separate ranking method.

c) Common ranking methods include:

i) Weighted Scoring: Assigns numerical values based on importance.

ii) Value vs Complexity: Evaluates impact versus effort.

iii) Kano Model: Focuses on customer satisfaction and expectations.

IV) Buy-a-feature: Allocates budget to prioritise features.

V) Opportunity Scoring: Identifies the most impactful tasks based on potential value.
 

Involve All Key Stakeholders

a) Provide proper context to ensure each initiative is placed in the correct category (must-have, should-have, could-have, won’t-have).

b) Identify stakeholders who can offer valuable insights at the start of the MoSCoW process.

c) Consider input from departments like sales, customer success, executive staff, or Product Managers in other areas.

d) Including diverse perspectives helps identify potential opportunities or threats the team might overlook.

e) Engaging relevant stakeholders ensures a well-rounded prioritisation process and more accurate scoring of initiatives.

Share Your MoSCoW Process Across Your Organisation

a) MoSCoW provides a clear, structured way to show how the team prioritises projects or tasks.

b) It helps build consensus and aligns everyone with the prioritisation strategy.

c) Sharing the methodology with stakeholders sets clear expectations and justifies decision-making processes.

d) When stakeholders understand the criteria behind prioritisation, they are more likely to respect the team’s choices.

e) If stakeholders disagree with a decision, they must be encouraged to present evidence rather than simply raising complaints.

Build your project leadership from the ground up! PRINCE2 Foundation & Practitioner Training will guide you - Sign up now!
 

Real-world Examples of MoSCoW Prioritisation in Action

These three examples will help you fully grasp the concept of MoSCoW Prioritisation:

1) Prioritising Features for a New Mobile App: A startup is developing a new mobile application and needs to determine which features to include in the initial launch.

a) Must-have: User authentication (login and signup), core functionality (e.g., messaging or content browsing) and data security measures.

b) Should-have: Push notifications, user profile customisation and in-app search functionality.

c) Could-have: Dark mode, integration with third-party services and advanced analytics for users.

d) Won’t-have: Augmented reality features and extensive social sharing options for future updates.

2) Organising Tasks for a Marketing Campaign: A marketing team is planning a campaign for a product launch and needs to prioritise tasks effectively.

a) Must-have: Create promotional content, schedule launch events and coordinate with sales teams.

b) Should-have: Engagement with influencers, development of email marketing sequences and preparation of press releases.

c) Could-have: Hosting webinars, creating behind-the-scenes content and running contests or giveaways.

d) Won’t-have: Developing a podcast series or launching a merchandise line for future campaigns.

3) Managing IT Infrastructure Upgrades: An IT department is upgrading its infrastructure and must prioritise various initiatives.

a) Must-have: Upgrading servers that are at capacity, implementing critical security patches and making sure data backup systems are operational.

b) Should-have: Migrating to a new email platform, updating internal communication tools, and enhancing network monitoring capabilities.

c) Could-have: Introducing new collaboration software, optimising existing workflows, and training sessions for staff on new tools.

d) Won’t-have: Exploring experimental technologies or overhauling systems that are functioning adequately to be revisited in the next fiscal year.
 

Conclusion

MoSCoW Prioritisation is a simple yet effective way to sort tasks, ensuring that critical work gets done first while keeping resources in check. Clearly defining must-haves, should-haves, could-haves, and won’t-haves can help your team stay focused, manage expectations, and deliver successful projects with greater clarity.

Equip yourself with the blueprint to manage project success! Sign up for our PRINCE2 Certification now!